I have handed in this assessment but they are questioning my referencing and that i have used AI can you help get me out of this mess please below is the email they have sent me Dear Kylie,

I am writing with a concern about assessment 4: Essay and Concept Map in Perioperative Nursing Practice.

I am a conducting an academic integrity investigation. This is a standard process when generative AI use is suspected.

Please note this is not an accusation, we are wanting to clarify inconsistencies with your assessment to ascertain its authenticity.

The triggers for this review are:

Numerous inconsistencies within your reference list:
Black & Baldwin (2021). DOI links to unrelated article. Unable to find original article in extensive database search.
Bu & Jezewski (2020). DOI does not work and unable to find original article in extensive database search.
Gillespie et al (2020). DOI takes to unrelated article and unable to find original article in search.
Lee et al (2023). DOI does not work. Article title does exist, but authors are completely different.
Russ et al (2021). DOI links to unrelated article. Cannot find article in database search.
Ulrich & Grady (2022). DOI links to unrelated article. Cannot find article in database search.
Wong et al (2023). DOI links to unrelated article. Cannot find article in database search
Would you please be able to explain why/how this score and inconsistencies have appeared? Have you used generative AI to formulate your reference list?

Please respond and attach the articles above. Please do not provide replacement articles with different titles/authors – we require your originally referenced articles.

Please respond with a detailed description of any generative AI software that you have utilised, and also a detailed description of the search databases you used to do your literature searches.

Other evidence you can provide includes:

Database research undertaken for the assessment
Drafts of work
PDF’s of references used in the development of your assessment.
We want this to be a learning opportunity to set you up for future success. However, if you are not able to provide the above analysis – this could also trigger the academic misconduct process as outlined in the Student Code of Conduct.

 

Essay:

Part one: 1200 Words

1.    600 words – Describe the neurophysiological mechanisms underpinning trauma and influencing the ongoing effects of trauma.

2.    600 words – Explain how this informs the principles of informed trauma-informed care with reference to attachment theory.

Rationale and Expectations:

Demonstrate understanding of theoretical concepts and their relationship to the application of trauma-informed care.

 

Part two: 600 words

ASSESSMENT TASK 2

Title of Assessment: Self-care plan and safety/stabilisation practicum. (No introduction or conclusion necessary)

Prepare a plan for your ongoing well-being as a people helper (Vicarious Trauma)

1.    250 words – Identify your indicators of differing levels of ANS arousal. (Autonomic nervous system)

2.    250 words – incorporates specific self-care strategies to use when working face-to-face with survivors of trauma (technique therapists can use for their own wellbeing during sessions with their trauma clients).

3.    100 words – includes general well-being strategies for daily life.

(No introduction or conclusion necessary)

Rationale and Expectations:

Provides opportunity for personal understanding of vicarious trauma and application of this understanding to personal self-care