Game Theory

Two Pay-off Matrices have to be created along with a 600-800 word essay/explanation of the matrice.
Referencing is required; however, the references have been provided in the marking key document along with guidance on how to write in-text references.

Project 2 Interpretation of unsaturated soil shear strength data by using different equations

If you feel there is no adequate information given at any question, you may assume
reasonable values for any additional information that you require, and briefly explain
why you feel it is necessary.
2. Write your name and student number on this paper and submit it with all your answer
sheets.
3. If doubt exists as to the interpretation or required parameters of any questions, you
may assume reasonable values for any additional information that you require, and
clearly state any assumptions made.

Strategies to enhance athlete performance

The assignment is in relation to a 16 yr old female shotput athlete. All the necessary information is included in the additional materials section

INF60007 – Business Information Systems

This is PowerPoint slide assignment but needs to give a lot of detail like a report and answer the question in each slide. i gave you my first assignment as a example
Assignment 3
Assignment 3
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeBusiness Overview
Brief identification of the business in terms of purpose and operating context. You should also explain the business problems/opportunities and areas for potential improvement.
3 to >2.1 Pts
Excellent
Clear and concise articulation of the context of the business, the key problems/opportunities, and areas for potential improvement.
2.1 to >1.5 Pts
Satisfactory
Business context and problems are identified superficially or lack clarity.
1.5 to >0 Pts
Poor
Failure to clearly describe the business. Business Problems/opportunities described in a trivial manner.
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeProcess Identification
Identification and explanation of the specific business process
4 to >2.8 Pts
Excellent
Most processes identified, categorised, and clearly put in context
2.8 to >2.0 Pts
Satisfactory
Some processes were identified and explained.
2 to >0 Pts
Poor
Very few business processes were identified and explained.
4 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeData
Overview of the data required to support the processes
5 to >3.5 Pts
Excellent
Key data is described clearly and concisely in terms of entities, attributes, and relations – using a standard format/approach.
3.5 to >2.5 Pts
Satisfactory
Some of the key data is described in terms of entities, attributes, and relations – using a standard format/approach. Potentially too many or missing data elements.
2.5 to >0 Pts
Poor
Failure to adequately identify key data in terms of entities, attributes, and relations – or use a standard format/approach.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeExternals
Overview of any external service or technology providers that may assist in streamlining operations and reducing costs
3 to >2.1 Pts
Excellent
A clear and concise description of the use of potential external service or technology providers that may assist in streamlining operations and reducing costs. Justification is clearly articulated.
2.1 to >1.5 Pts
Satisfactory
Some description of the use of potential external service or technology providers that may assist in streamlining operations and reducing costs. Little or no justification.
1.5 to >0 Pts
Poor
Poor attempt to describe the use of potential external service or technology providers that may assist in streamlining operations and reducing costs. No credible justification was provided.
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeProcess Improvement Opportunity
An evaluation of processes that could be improved together with a description of the proposed improvement.
4 to >2.8 Pts
Excellent
A clear and concise evaluation of processes that could be improved together with a description of the proposed improvement.
2.8 to >2.0 Pts
Satisfactory
A satisfactory evaluation of processes that could be improved together with a description of the proposed improvement.
2 to >0 Pts
Poor
A superficial evaluation of processes that could be improved together with a description of the proposed improvement.
4 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeBusiness Analytics
Explain how the use of Business Analytics could assist the business to increase their market share
4 to >2.8 Pts
Excellent
Clear and concise explanation, with evidence and reasoning for the the potential benefits of using Business Analytics
2.8 to >2.0 Pts
Satisfactory
Business Analytics options are adequately explained and justified
2 to >0 Pts
Poor
Failure to identify or explain any Business Analytics options
4 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeBenefits and Concerns
Identification of potential value created, ethical and security issues relating to the improved process
4 to >2.8 Pts
Excellent
Clear and concise explanation of potential value created, with evidence and reasoning, of tangible/intangible benefits, ethical risks and security concerns
2.8 to >2.0 Pts
Satisfactory
Some explanation of potential value created, with evidence and reasoning, of tangible/intangible benefits, ethical risks and security concerns
2 to >0 Pts
Poor
Poor or no explanation of potential value created, or evidence and reasoning, of tangible/intangible benefits, ethical risks and security concerns
4 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeImplementation Risks
Identification of the risks associated with implementing the proposed changes.
3 to >2.1 Pts
Excellent
Identifies the key implementation risks for the proposed changes
2.1 to >1.5 Pts
Satisfactory
Provides a satisfactory account of the key implementation risks associated with the proposed changes
1.5 to >0 Pts
Poor
Poor attempt at identifying the key implementation risks for the proposed changes
3 pts

Introduction to Finance Principles

Please not that this assignment involves finance calculations and workings.

Show all working to demonstrate you have understood how to solve each problem.
•
If you use a financial calculator, state the sequence of steps to solve the problem.
•
Please present your answers in at least 4 non-zero decimal places. i.e., 0.00001234 or 0.1234.
•
Students are to submit their assignments onto Blackboard. The assignment must be typed (Word, Excel or PDF).
•
Answer must be legible. If the marker cannot follow or read your answers, marks cannot be rewarded.
•
Answer all sections.

compare and contrast a QCAA senior General syllabus with any of the Applied syllabus in your Technologies subjects teaching area.

My chosen teaching area is engineering. Please compare engineering skills (applied) with engineering (general). This assignment is in reference to materials in Queensland Australia. 

MGMT 3000 – Negotiation simulation reflection task (Assessment 2

This is an individual assessment. Each student is to submit their response through Turnitin.

1. Critically analyse how cognitive biases impacted your approach to the group negotiation activity (1,000 words).

2. Provide a detailed analysis of the interplay of content, process and relationship within your team and between your team and your opposition (1,000 words).

Grand Challenge in Business: A3 Solution Development & Pitching

This pis for the following amendment to complete the order in 2 days: 

Congratulations!

You have successfully paid for ORDER 70207

 
 

Order ID: 70207

Order Amount: $129.64

Grand Challenge in Business: A3 Solution Development & Pitching

I require a PowerPoint Presentation with a narrative, (a sample template is provided which you need to use). The total number of slides allowed is 9 (excluding the reference list) This is a follow-up from A2 (PestleSwotAnalysis) for this subject which is provided in the attachments. All information to complete this is provided in the Grangchellengebusinessassessment3 zip folder. Please I ask you to utilise these materials and references while addressing the rubric format. You can also utilise other referencing materials for support, but they must be credible and peer-reviewed. Please reach out if you need further clarification. Referencing is APA7 Work count is equivalent to a maximum speech limit of 5min 3sec. Images used within the presentation must be source-referenced.

Strategies to enhance athlete performance