This is PowerPoint slide assignment but needs to give a lot of detail like a report and answer the question in each slide. i gave you my first assignment as a example
Assignment 3
Assignment 3
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeBusiness Overview
Brief identification of the business in terms of purpose and operating context. You should also explain the business problems/opportunities and areas for potential improvement.
3 to >2.1 Pts
Excellent
Clear and concise articulation of the context of the business, the key problems/opportunities, and areas for potential improvement.
2.1 to >1.5 Pts
Satisfactory
Business context and problems are identified superficially or lack clarity.
1.5 to >0 Pts
Poor
Failure to clearly describe the business. Business Problems/opportunities described in a trivial manner.
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeProcess Identification
Identification and explanation of the specific business process
4 to >2.8 Pts
Excellent
Most processes identified, categorised, and clearly put in context
2.8 to >2.0 Pts
Satisfactory
Some processes were identified and explained.
2 to >0 Pts
Poor
Very few business processes were identified and explained.
4 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeData
Overview of the data required to support the processes
5 to >3.5 Pts
Excellent
Key data is described clearly and concisely in terms of entities, attributes, and relations – using a standard format/approach.
3.5 to >2.5 Pts
Satisfactory
Some of the key data is described in terms of entities, attributes, and relations – using a standard format/approach. Potentially too many or missing data elements.
2.5 to >0 Pts
Poor
Failure to adequately identify key data in terms of entities, attributes, and relations – or use a standard format/approach.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeExternals
Overview of any external service or technology providers that may assist in streamlining operations and reducing costs
3 to >2.1 Pts
Excellent
A clear and concise description of the use of potential external service or technology providers that may assist in streamlining operations and reducing costs. Justification is clearly articulated.
2.1 to >1.5 Pts
Satisfactory
Some description of the use of potential external service or technology providers that may assist in streamlining operations and reducing costs. Little or no justification.
1.5 to >0 Pts
Poor
Poor attempt to describe the use of potential external service or technology providers that may assist in streamlining operations and reducing costs. No credible justification was provided.
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeProcess Improvement Opportunity
An evaluation of processes that could be improved together with a description of the proposed improvement.
4 to >2.8 Pts
Excellent
A clear and concise evaluation of processes that could be improved together with a description of the proposed improvement.
2.8 to >2.0 Pts
Satisfactory
A satisfactory evaluation of processes that could be improved together with a description of the proposed improvement.
2 to >0 Pts
Poor
A superficial evaluation of processes that could be improved together with a description of the proposed improvement.
4 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeBusiness Analytics
Explain how the use of Business Analytics could assist the business to increase their market share
4 to >2.8 Pts
Excellent
Clear and concise explanation, with evidence and reasoning for the the potential benefits of using Business Analytics
2.8 to >2.0 Pts
Satisfactory
Business Analytics options are adequately explained and justified
2 to >0 Pts
Poor
Failure to identify or explain any Business Analytics options
4 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeBenefits and Concerns
Identification of potential value created, ethical and security issues relating to the improved process
4 to >2.8 Pts
Excellent
Clear and concise explanation of potential value created, with evidence and reasoning, of tangible/intangible benefits, ethical risks and security concerns
2.8 to >2.0 Pts
Satisfactory
Some explanation of potential value created, with evidence and reasoning, of tangible/intangible benefits, ethical risks and security concerns
2 to >0 Pts
Poor
Poor or no explanation of potential value created, or evidence and reasoning, of tangible/intangible benefits, ethical risks and security concerns
4 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeImplementation Risks
Identification of the risks associated with implementing the proposed changes.
3 to >2.1 Pts
Excellent
Identifies the key implementation risks for the proposed changes
2.1 to >1.5 Pts
Satisfactory
Provides a satisfactory account of the key implementation risks associated with the proposed changes
1.5 to >0 Pts
Poor
Poor attempt at identifying the key implementation risks for the proposed changes
3 pts